Archive for the 'Reviews' Category

Thinking of Upgrading

I’m thinking of upgrading the blog to WordPress 2.1.  I did it to my development site and didn’t have a single problem. But just because I didn’t have any issues there won’t mean that things will go off without a hitch here.  Here, I’ve got a lot more plugins and a non-standard theme that might not work.  Normally, my hosting provider takes care of the install but I figured that I start messing around with a WP install and get to know this system a little more. Installing the LAMP part is still a mystery.  One of these days, I’ll get it up and running on my Ubuntu box – which, by the way, is going strong with over 137 days of no unplanned downtime.

I followed the simple instructions that the folks at WordPress recommend you follow.  Its pretty standard, really.  Back up your database using phpAdmin and download all your HTML generating files within the hosting space for the domain and you’re covered if when you make a mistake. Then, its recommended you delete all the files you just downloaded as a backup from the original space.  Copy over the new WP 2.1 files and run the upgrade command. Of course, you’ll probably need to recreate your wp-config.php file like I had to for the upgrade to take but once it does, like most upgrades… its done in a flash.

From the poking around I did on my dev site, I’ve found the changes to be great. The sticky features I haven’t played with in great detail but it can be very helpful for a few. They changed how some items like comments, links, uploads, and posts are managed but the basic logic is there – only the navigation to them see mend to change. The big changes (besides the bug fixes) are found in the composition windows.
The new composition window is very AJAX-y. It includes a spell checker (finally!) and a tab to quickly move between WYSIWYG and HTML editing modes – a must for all power users. And it also sports a new upload manager with better thumbnail support. I’ll be honest when I say I haven’t tried that last part out but that’s what many other people are saying about it.

Overall, I love the changes and already am salivating at what could be coming down the WP 2.2 pipeline. I’ll slowly upgrade all the other blogs I host and see how the themes and plugins interact with the new version and report back any anomalies…

Because I know you care.

P.A.D. – Post #7: Modern Marvels

Modern Marvels is one of my most favorite shows on television. It’s up there with The Simpsons, Family Guy, Futurama, (the original) Law & Order, Nature, Nova, and Smallville. And while I don’t rush home to watch the show or record every new episode like I do my prime time shows, I watch it more often than I do those other programs – in fact, I’m watching it right now as I type. And although the format and topic vary, the true subject matter is always the same: technology.

One of the reasons why Modern Marvels is in the list of my favorite shows is number of shows they produce under the series. You can watch the show several times in a day and still not see a repeat. There are so many shows that I’ve only seen two or three topics replayed. Now, I know there are repeats but there are so many shows that I don’t ever feel like I’ve seen an episode before – very different from the programs (especially those with limited runs).

Another reason I love the show so much is the wide array of topics they highlight. For example, tonight they are showing the world’s fastest; the fastest air craft, car, boat, and train. Soon, they will air an episode on the space shuttle. They have also broadcasted shows on stealth technology (some devoted to air craft only and others that talk about stealth for boats). But the also talk about historical accomplishments and not just about the latest and greatest that we enjoy today.

Modern Marvels has talked about major achievements like bridges (Golden Gate Bridge, Brooklyn Bridge, etc.) and dams – Hoover, for example. They also highlight intellectual accomplishments like the assembly line, construction techniques and materials, and skyscrapers. They review past technology and speak about how it shaped present or future inovations. They even review the tools used to create the world’s inventions. But what keeps the show interesting is how they show how technology (and the humans that create and use it) fails us.

There is a regular recurring series called Engineering Disasters that catalogs many of the mistakes – and lessons learned – from bad design and poorly implemented technology. Some of my favorite disaster shows talk about an accidental lake draining, the Great Fire of 1906 in San Francisco (after the earthquake), and sinking bridges. There are at least 17 different episodes that follow this theme and it makes for some interesting television. But disasters aren’t the only thing that keeps the show interesting.

The show also reviews common household items and food like candy, hot dogs, pizza, snacks, and all types of desserts. They also talk about drinks like coffee, soda, and spirits. They even go into the history of paint, exterminators, ice, glue, TNT, map making, Las Vegas tech, leather, sex, oil, sewers, sport technology, towing, and torture devices (useful with the leather and sex episodes ;) ). The list goes on and on… there are 325 DVDs available on the show’s website and each episode is on one DVD.

There are a lot of great shows out there – especially on the History Channel – that I really enjoy watching. But Modern Marvels is one of those shows that always entertains, informs, educates, and amazes me – I even laugh sometimes at the disaster shows. And because they are shown frequently on the History Channel, I can always be comforted that when there is nothing good on the networks or they are full of repeats, I can always find something cool and new on Modern Marvels.

P.A.D. – Post #2: Color Tools

This one has to be quick.  I’ve got lots of work to do today.

I’m changing the theme again because I want to add a little more color to the site – make it more energetic.  I still want to keep it light and image free so I downloaded K2 and installed it.  So far, it looks ok but it looks like every other K2 theme out there.  I’ve got to come up with a new color scheme for it and then, I think, it will look good.  To do that, I’m using two sites that help web developers get the right color combos.

The first one is an old favorite of mine and it’s a free offering from VisiBone called Color Lab.  VisiBone sells ‘cheat sheets’ for HTML, CSS, javascript, fonts, and other website related topics so when coding, one doesn’t always have to look at a large book or toggle between windows to find information.  And while I haven’t purchased their books or cards (but tempted to), I have used their free tool.  That tool shows you a 216 color pallet that displays the hex, RGB, and CMKY values for any color you select.  As you select other colors, it shows how the previous color looks next to the newly selected color and you can view up to 8 color sections at any one time.  You also see how each color would look as a background and foreground color so you can pick 8 colors and see how they look as text, links, hovers, background, and headers together.  You can do all this without even having to code yourself – it takes the trial and error out of the color selection process.

The other site I am using is the Color Palette Generator from DeGraeve.com.  Steve DeGraeve has created a wonderful set of tools that anyone can use.  There are too many to list but check them out here.  The palette generator, however, lets you take an image on the web and create hex values of the colors in that image.  If you like a company logo, for example, point to it and let his code tell you what the colors’ hex translations are.  I’m tempted to take some color swatches from Home Depot, scanning them in and posting them to this site and use Steve’s tool to do its thing.  I’m even thinking of taking screen shots of other websites and using those colors for inspiration.

Ultimately, I’m not sure what I’ll do color wise, but these two websites are going to help me.  If you are into HTML, CSS, and design.  These two offerings may help you pick the right colors.

P.A.D. – Post #1: Google Reader

Today I’m switching my RSS reader from Bloglines to Google Reader. Google recently upgraded their reader and just about everyone agrees that it was changed for the better. I, for one, agree that it has changed for the better but I also think it can get better still. Mostly through user preferences, however, and not so much in the most raw or basic functionality. I’m not as happy with Google Reader as I am with Bloglines but I like it enough to use it for all my RSS reading.

Bloglines is great. it has a great interface with the feeds you watch & read on the left with the articles on the right. It looks like a Windows Explorer interface if it were able to handle RSS feeds – folders on the left, folder contents on the right. And that’s what I like about Bloglines. if you organize your feeds into categories, like I do, you can easily navigate to a particular subject or feed very easily; it makes reading 110 feeds more manageable than just a simple list. If I wanted, I could navigate to the main topic area – say, technology – and read all my tech blogs like Engadget, DownloadSquad, TUAW, Slashdot, and the other 36 sites that cover that general subject. Of course, I can also navigate to a particular blog or feed and read it only. It comes in handy when you want to review a feed with rapidly changing entries like Ask MetaFilter. Bloglines has made improvements to itself which make getting updates easier but its an already robust web application.

Google Reader, however, is not a mature application and, admittedly so, it lacks some of the refinements that Bloglines has. Its first version was openly criticized and almost no one that I spoke to used it. But with the recent upgrade, people are beginning to switch to it – and with good reason. Not only does it address the concerns people had with it before, it offers functionality that many other services – Bloglines included – do not, and it makes the reading even easier still.

Like Bloglines, Google Reader has a folder like view but uses tags or labels as its way of separating the feeds from one another – their version of folders, really. And like the others, Google Reader lets you select from all your feeds, a folder, or a specific feed in the folders to read. It displays the first 20 or so unread articles and as you scroll down, it loads new ones; you never have to wait for the entire feed to load like you do with Bloglines. But Google Reader has some features that make it much easier to use which is why I’m switching.

First, it shares the familiar interface of Gmail and Calendar and, now, Docs & Spreadsheets. The shared select all or none is there with the filter by tag option helping out. And with those features, changing folders is a breeze. Bloglines lets you drag and drop – a very cool GUI based tool – but sometimes less is more and I can get a lot more changes made by using less flashy means. Also like Google’s other offerings is the seamless navigation between your feeds and the settings. Adjusting your preferences is fast that way and makes quick adjustments even more hassle free. The familiar DHTML/AJAX/Fancy Google code makes this all possible and you can see the lessons from Google Maps, Gmail, and other GOOG products materialize here.

Another reason I’m switching is the ways you can view your feeds. You can select the traditional interface with the articles fully expanded on the right or you can use a Gmail like interface with the unread articles in a list. In place of the author is the feed’s title and the subject is the title of the blog entry. And like Gmail, the first few words of the posts appear as conversation snippits that help you determine the importance of reading an article. If you click on the double arrows on the very right, you are taken to the post right off the site (useful for those feeds that don’t offer you the full article). If you click on the blog or article title, the entire article shows up and you can read that single post without others cluttering up your view. While Bloglines lets you customize how you view your feeds, you can’t change it on the fly like you can with Google Reader.

I do wish somethings were different about Google Reader that I like about Bloglines. For example, I like it how Bloglines asks you want folder you want to put new feeds into. With Google, its a two step process and you first have to subscribe to the feed and then add the tag to it later.

I also wish that the sorting options were better. I happen to like chronology as a sorting method like all the others do but I also want it sorted by feed title first. That way, I’m not flipping subject matter within a category. In my technology folder, I have different feeds for Apple, AJAX, gadgets, software, and tech commentary; with Google’s sorting system, all the feeds are listing in the order in which they were posted – no matter what site they came from. That means I’m reading a post on an iPod and then an article on JavaScript only to go back to an older iPod article.

I also wish there was a search feature or a history feature. With Bloglines, I can search for a post and I can go back in time with my session or a specific calendar period for all articles. If I forget to tag an article with del.icio.us, I can always use Bloglines to search for it again – very useful when you don’t know what feed the entry came from. I’m surprised Google hasn’t added that since they offer that feature with Gmail. If they had that search, I would have no reason to look at Bloglines again.

Generally, though, I like the latest version of Google’s RSS aggregator. And they recently made it a goal for their programmers to make their existing products better instead of launching new products for the sake of launching them. Even after the recent update, there was another minor update again based on some feedback in the forum they set up. If they continue to innovate like that I’ll be singing the praise of Google Reader for months to come.

Performancing

I’ve just installed Performancing, a Firefox extension and blogging tool, and I have to say I am not impressed. I’m writing and publishing this post with it now and it looks like a good WYSIWYG editor but it is no different than the editor that is bundled with WordPress. Maybe for those who user Movable Type will find it useful but I am 99.99% positive that MT does have a WYSIWYG editor too. Hell, Blogger has one and its free and in serious neglect by Google.

Go to Performancing’s site to see a list of features which you may or may not find interesting. Nothing really stands out for me except one flaw: No spell check.

Supposedly, there is support for the spell check that comes with Firefox 2.0 but since I don’t run it, I don’t get to use that feature. And its not a feature of Performancing, really. Its a Firefox feature.

I suppose the thing I could say about the extension is this: It combines a few features into one platform but doesn’t do them well enough to convince me to not use all the apps it intents to replace.

For example, it has built in del.icio.us support which I can do on my own or with a different Firefox extension. I don’t tag my own posts in del.icio.us because I’m not into to that kind of shameless promotion – I shamelessly promote myself in other ways.

I mentioned the technorati tags earlier but, again, that can all be controlled with a plugin for WordPress. If MT, Blogger, and the other systems it supports doesn’t have that, then this might be useful but for me and my WP blog, its not all that helpful.

There is built in FTP support and image uploading but what system doesn’t have at least image uploading?

You can manage multiple blogs (using different CMS types) all in one place – that is helpful. But Flock can do that and it comes with a spell checker!!

Sorry I keep mentioning that. I can’t get over that missing feature. If Performancing had one, I’d using it all the time in a heartbeat.

Anyway, I’m giving it this shot… and if you think it could be helpful, then you should too. But I still believe that you can do more with either the standard interfaces the blogging systems offer you or with extra tools you can download and incorporate yourself.

Latest Tweets:

  • I wonder why the Coast Guard is escorting the Staten Island Ferry. 4 hrs ago
  • I think it's getting very cold in Hell right now. My dad is thinking of getting an iPhone. Too bad I can't get him on a Mac just yet. :-/ 7 hrs ago
  • This day keeps getting worse. Somebody hates me right now. 9 hrs ago
  • Being here can mean only one thing. I'm back at work. :-( (@ Starbucks) http://4sq.com/88Enzo 12 hrs ago
  • A special thanks to @WhatsUpMartha for all the great Martha's Vineyard advice this week! Can't wait to be back! Might try a week off season. 3 days ago
  • More updates...

Posting tweet...

Archives